We had the orders but we didn't have a bank that would finance them for us. Supported formats: FB2, TXT, RTF, DOC, TCR, HTML, EPUB, CHM, PDB, MOBI. We were looking to hit break-even within the first year following the trading cycle that we'd been following. CoolReader is fast and small cross-platform XML/CSS based eBook reader for desktops and handheld devices. More recently a source close to the company clarified: "On a month-by-month basis we were trading profitably. It claims to be "the first ebookstore outside the US to partner with Google Books".Īsked before Christmas how many units Interead would have to sell to break even, Jones said it was already in profit. If you see your pet get burned or scalded, cool the burned area by. The site is owned by a separate company, registered in the British Virgin Islands, called . If you suspect a spinal injury or broken bone, lay the dog on a board and immobilize. Jones is still involved in a website called, which sells ebooks for the Cool-er and other electronic readers. The company has not filed any accounts and is being wound up following an outstanding claim from public relations advisers. Neil Jones, the Marbella-based British entrepreneur who founded Interead in March last year, has told friends he is the firm's biggest creditor, claiming to have put about $1m (£660,000) into the business. What we want to do is maximise what we can get for creditors." The source claimed 37,000 e-readers had been sold in more than 30 countries and the business continues to flourish outside the UK. Meanwhile, Interead claims an order for 17,000 Cool-ers from a high-profile American retail group was cancelled at the 11th hour, plunging relations with its Taiwanese manufacturers into crisis.Ī source close to the business said: "From our point of view we would rather keep things quiet than have a story. Since then, however, the business has failed to win essential support for its expansion from its bank, HSBC, under the government's enterprise finance guarantee, according to sources close to the company. We no longer have an active working relationship with this supplier and were unaware of the suggested recent developments within their business."Įarlier this year Interead reportedly said it had 20% of the e-reader market in Britain and before Christmas claimed it had already broken into profit. Some critics point out that buying plane tickets at all keeps airports expanding and the aviation industry growing.In a statement Argos said: "We took the commercial decision earlier this year to phase out this product range. There’s considerable disagreement about the effectiveness of carbon offsets, and whether they really bring about conservation measures that would not have happened without the purchase of the offset. Our seats on the flights to Greece would emit 10 metric tons.īy some calculations, then, our vacation would be a net win for the planet.īut of course it’s not so simple. and blends into a super-thin, barely noticeable bandage to a broken page. The pipe connects to your cookstove, and you cook with the methane - burning it off pollutes much less than just releasing it, and much less than burning coal or wood.Īccording to Cool Effect’s math, my donation will prevent the emission of the equivalent of 30 metric tons of carbon dioxide. Theres also no shortage of gadgets you can buy to streamline a readers life. As the manure decomposes, it releases methane, a greenhouse gas far more destructive than carbon dioxide. You put manure - cow, pig, human, whatever - and water in it. Last week, I went to the website of a nonprofit called Cool Effect that sells offsets and gave it $168 to support a project to install biogas digesters in households in China and Vietnam.Ī biogas digester is basically a vat with a pipe attached to it. They said I was letting big corporations and governments off the hook for their refusal to make huge across-the-board changes to stop global warming. Other readers, conversely, were irked that I was focusing on individual travel at all. “You’ve broken my heart,” someone else wrote, “knowing full well the consequences and yet still choosing personal gratification over the hope that your ‘sacrifice’ will help as every small action adds up.” “You are literally performing the cop-out that your article purports to critique,” someone wrote on Twitter. A lot of readers were furious when they got to the end. I could not think of anything to say about it other than that we planned to buy carbon offsets to counteract the effects of our flights, and hope for the best. I felt compelled to mention this, too, at the end of the article. But I kept doing the math and kept getting the same answer: My family’s one-week winter-break trip to Florida would shrink the ice cover by 90 square feet.īy this point, we had already decided to go to Greece for summer vacation, a far more destructive journey. I plugged in numbers from a carbon-footprint calculator and … no, that couldn’t be right.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |